The Rushden Echo, 3rd January 1964, transcribed by Gill Hollis
This Pavilion is so ‘Ugly’
Mr. R. H. S. Greenwood described the pavilion which Rushden Urban Council plans to build in Spencer Park as “one of the ugliest buildings in town” at the December meeting.
Mr. Greenwood had seen an outline drawing outside the council chambers and suggested it should be more in keeping with the town and not so modernistic.
Mrs. G. Marriott, chairman of the parks committee, explained that it would be hard to appreciate what it would be like from the drawing. “We have had to be very careful,” she stated. “There is so much vandalism that we have had to cut out all the glass and that does detract from its appearance.
Justified
Presenting other improvements for the park for the council’s approval she said that no one was satisfied with it at present. “There has been a lot of criticism in the paper which has been absolutely justified,” she said.
“Now is the time for us to make it a place to be proud of in the town.”
The alterations included culverting the brook (£12,000), building a new paddling pool (£600), providing a new sandpit (£150), improving a children’s playground, fencing off, repairing the path(£400) and transferring the putting green site (£175).
The council agreed to include the approximate figures in next year’s estimates.
Mrs. A. U. Muxlow said she found from experience that sandpits were unhygienic as people seemed to use them as a place to exercise their dogs at night. “Unless they are fenced off they are more a source of trouble than pleasure,” she said.
Mrs. D. E. Shrive, welcoming the proposal to culvert the brook, said this should have been done a long time ago.
Last Resort
Commenting on the committee’s warning that unless damage to children’s playgrounds stopped equipment might be removed, Mr. E. F. Mawson hoped this would only be done as a last resort.
Mrs. Marriott assured him it would, adding that the council could not afford to meet the annual expense of repairing this damage.
Referring to an application from the Rushden and Higham Rugby Club for the committee to consider the provision of a pitch she said she felt that the council should do all in its power to help.
“They have not asked us to spend a lot of money; they are quite willing to undertake the construction and maintenance of any land leased to them,” she said.
About the complaints from Rushden United Cricket Club, she told the council that the first the committee had known about them was when they read stories in the Press. The council should not comply with the club’s request to provide a special pitch.
The committee was quite satisfied that the parks’ superintendent had always provided a decent wicket. The club claimed that it was not properly rolled, cut or watered.
|