Mr. John Claridge presided on Wednesday evening and there were also present:- Messrs. F. Knight, G. Denton, H. Brawn, B. Mortimer, J. Spencer, W. H. Wilkins, G. Miller, and G. H. Skinner, with Mr. G. S. Mason (clerk), Mr. Madin (surveyor), and Mr. Martin (sanitary inspector).
Committee Work
The Council in committee reported:-
Plans were presented by Mr. John Ridgeway for six houses and house and shop situated in a new street off Cromwell-road and passed subject to slight alterations; Mr. J. Jones, for four houses on the Victoria Estate and rejected on account of the insufficient block plan and also on the ground that the erection of two houses fronting the occupation road is the commencement of the laying out of a new street for which a plan should be submitted; Mr. G. Rogers for house, shop, and outbuildings in Spencer-road and passed; Mr. Joseph A. Button for house on Park-road and rejected for correct block plan; Mr. Amos Wright for alterations to houses on Wellingborough-road and passed.
Team Labour. The sub-committee reported that the hiring of satisfactory stable accommodation for horses was practically out of the question, and they were unanimously agreed that it was not desirable. The committee recommended the Council to forthwith proceed to erect stables and cart sheds on the Council’s land in Newton-road at an estimated cost of £420. The cost of purchasing two horses with carts and harness they estimate at £136. The committee reported that they had carefully considered the question of the annual cost of maintenance, which, including the annual instalments in respect of loan, they estimated at £200 a year. The committee recommended the Council to refer it to the Finance Committee for consideration with the annual estimates.
Sewerage Scheme. The Surveyor was authorised to negotiate for local assistance in preparing levels, &c., of outfall for the Local Government Board. He was also instructed to proceed with the second outfall sewer at once.
Stone Throwing. A report from the police as to stone throwing on Wellingborough-road was received and no order was made.
The recommendations were adopted.
Mr. Parkin and The Clerk
The Chairman said that statements had been made by the Rev. M. E. Parkin at a Liberal meeting seriously reflecting upon their clerk (Mr. Mason) who would like to make a statement.
Mr. Mason: At a recent meeting in connection with the forthcoming election a complaint was made by a gentleman on behalf of Mr. Thos. Wilmott that the latter had not been treated with the courtesy due from me as clerk to him as a member of the Council in respect to a letter addressed by him to me with regard to the Windmill Estate. The letter in question had reference to certain expenses incurred by the Council on this estate and inquired how it was that several owners had received no demand for payment. I assumed the letter referred to the street works then just completed, and, if certain owners received no demand, the position might have been a serious one. I could not understand (after the great trouble taken) how such a thing could have happened, and in view of the consequences which might have ensued had such been the case. I saw Mr. Wilkins, he having as chairman at the time of the provisional apportionment rendered Mr. Pare, the late surveyor, considerable assistance in making it. Mr. Wilkins undertook to see Mr. Wilmott and ascertain from him what he referred to. Mr. Wilkins subsequently reported to me that he had seen Mr. Wilmott and found that his letter had reference to the sewer and not the streets, that he had explained to Mr. Wilmott the position we as a Council were in with regard to the sewers; and that thereupon Mr. Wilmott was satisfied. I considered the matter ended. It was not a question that could, with any advantage, have been discussed by correspondence, and I had more than once considered the same point with the Council. I regret Mr. Wilmott should have thought he had been treated otherwise than with the greatest respect and I am sure the Council would not for a moment think I should wilfully treat a member whose views have always been most carefully considered by them, otherwise than with the greatest courtesy. (Hear, hear.) I regret that my name should have been introduced in connection with election matters at this stage, because as returning officer for both elections it is my duty to abstain from any part in the elections otherwise than as an absolutely impartial officer.
Mr. Wilkins quite confirmed what Mr. Mason had said. He (Mr. Wilkins) saw Mr. Wilmott and explained matters fully to him, and, as far as he could understand, Mr. Wilmott was perfectly satisfied with the explanation.
Mr. Spencer said they could all testify to Mr. Mason’s courtesy to all the members. (Hear,hear.) The remarks of Mr. Parkin were uncalled for in any shape or form.
The Chairman said that Mr. Mason’s conduct was to be commended.
Mr. Spencer: I think Mr. Parkin
Wanted A Free Advertisment.
Mr. Wilkins said that Mr. Parkin’s statement was also a serious reflection on the Council. Mr. Parkin said that Mr. Wilmott could have attended more meetings and would have done but for his treatment by the Council.
Mr. Skinner said that all the members had been pleased to see Mr. Wilmott at the meetings (Hear, hear.)
Mr. Spencer: I have had many conversations with Mr. Wilmott but I have never heard him complain of the treatment of any of the members, and it seems strange it should have cropped up now. I have my doubts whether Mr. Wilmott stated it.
Mr. Mortimer: It was only mentioned at a Liberal committee meeting.
The Chairman: But it gets into the papers and is talked about.
Mr. Mortimer: It has been in the papers that the Conservative members are no use, that they are good for nothing, and are not fit to sit on a Board or Council of any sort. (Laughter.)
The Chairman: But this is a reflection upon our clerk. We are all satisfied with this explanation.
Mr. Knight told Mr. Mortimer that public men were always subject to criticism.
Mr. Mortimer: This was said at a meeting of the Liberal Association and it is a disgrace. We as Conservative members can do as good work as any of the members of the Board.
The Chairman: Order, order.
Mr. Mortimer: I feel this very strongly and I shall not let it drop yet.
The Chairman: Order, order.
Mr. Mortimer (warmly): It is disgraceful.
The Chairman: Order.
Mr. Mortimer: It is disgraceful. You may laugh, Mr. Denton, but it is disgraceful.
The little breeze then subsided.
Insufficient Sewers
The Sanitary Inspector complained of a nuisance caused by a sewer from six cottages and a factory in Sandpit-lane emptying near Mr. Checksfield’s property. He recommended that the sewer be extended about 60 yards.
Messrs. Claridge, Knight, and Miller were appointed a committee to inspect and report.
Election of Overseers
Mr. Denton moved that the retiring overseers, Messrs. Wilkins, J. T. Colson, and John Claridge, be re-elected, and Mr. Spencer seconded.
Mr. Mortimer thought there should be four.
Mr. Miller was nominated but he withdrew, asking, however, that the names should be put separately. He did not think any one had any objection to Mr. Wilkins or Mr. Claridge. He had no objection to Mr. Colson except that he was not a member of the Council. He thought they should appoint only members of the council.
Mr. Denton’s motion was carried. Mr. Skinner remained neutral, and Mr. Miller and Mr. Mortimer voted against.
Caretaker
Mrs. Wheeler resigned her post of caretaker of the Vestry-hall and Mrs. Walter Lovell, of Church-street, was appointed.