Click here to return to the main site entry page
Click here to return to the previous page

Roads Plans - 1956-60

The Rushden Echo and Argus, 23rd March 1956, transcribed by Jim Hollis

Plan for one-way traffic
The possibility of using Rectory Road as an experimental return route for a one-way traffic system at Rushden was mentioned at the annual meeting of Rushden Chamber of Trade.

The secretary, Mr. Roland Evans, said the urban council had been approached with this suggestion. The idea arose out of the chamber’s aim to improve shopping conditions in the High Street – part of their trade promotion plan.

Alternatively, they hoped to get better parking facilities.

Mr. Evans also drew members’ attention to the new rating and valuation assessments. He said it would help check general inflation if trades people decided to protest individually against the new assessments, though they must be prepared for their cases to go against them.

Mr. Leslie Philips was elected president. Other officers: senior vice-president, Mr. P. M. C. Tompkins; junior vice-president, Mr. A. C. Wright; treasurer, Mr. E. V. H. Preedy; auditor, Mr. L. G. Roberts; secretary, Mr. Roland Evans; committee, Miss K. Jeeves, Mr. B. R. Palmer, Mr. J. White.

The Rushden Echo and Argus, 10th October 1958, transcribed by Gill Hollis

‘Zebra’ crossing for diversion?
Should there be a pedestrian crossing on Rushden’s new traffic diversion route along Rectory Road?

This question was asked at the “Any Questions” meeting held by Rushden St. Crispin’s Townswomen’s Guild at the Alfred Street School on Monday, Mrs. A. Muxlow presided.

Mr. W. J. A. Peck, who is chairman of the Northamptonshire Road Safety Committee, said that as the diversion has just come into operation and was still in the experimental stages, the authorities had not yet decided which the best place for such a crossing was. It was bad policy to have too many pedestrian crossings too close together because motorists then tended to ignore them.

One-Way?
Another question was whether one-way traffic only should be allowed in High Street.

Mr. Peck said it depended upon whether you were a shopkeeper, a motorist or lived in High Street. He thought that one-way traffic in High Street was not essential if north-bound traffic was sent down Skinners Hill and south-bound traffic took the new diversion, so that there was one-way traffic on Church Parade but not actually in High Street.

In this way only local traffic that particularly wanted to go into High Street would turn up Church Street to get there.

Other members of the panel were Mr. H. W. Ellis, public health officer and sanitary inspector to Rushden Urban District Council, Mrs. P. Newnes, branch officer of the British Red Cross Society, Kettering, and Mr. E. Mabbutt, industrial safety officer of British Timken Ltd., Duston.

On the subject of frozen food and whether it will oust the position of fresh food in years to come, Mrs. Newnes said that it probably would, because with improved methods the food values in the frozen food would equal those of fresh foods.

Mr. Mabbutt said that a foods for years was being opened up.

Mr. Peck offered the view that the high prices restricted the expansion of the frozen food trade.

The provision of a sufficient number of litter baskets in Rushden was discussed, and Mr. Ellis said that instructions had been given by the health committee for surveys to be carried out to find the points at which there was the greatest need, and for litter baskets to be put there. Further education in this matter was still needed to prevent the leaving of litter.

The meeting ended with the sale of harvest produce which members had contributed and £3 15s was raised.

The Rushden Echo and Argus, 29th August 1958, transcribed by Gill Hollis

Rushden: town of paint and posts
Not everyone is happy about the new voluntary diversion scheme for southbound traffic at Rushden. The new collection of signs for motorists has caused many people to comment on the way the town’s streets are becoming littered with notices.

Many times strangers have spoken of the great number of notices to be seen. Local people, used to seeing the signs day by day, have not been aware of just how densely signposted their town has become. Now it is difficult not to notice.

How many signs are there in the whole of Rushden? There must be hundreds scattered about the streets. The exact number would stagger most people if known.

Check-Up
To get some facts, on this much discussed matter, a reporter walked along the main A6 route, observing and counting the notices on the road and near to it.

The first check was made on the direct route, from Toll Bar, at the border with Higham Ferrers, along Higham Road, High Street, High Street South and Bedford Road to the end of the built-up area.

Then checks were made along the new voluntary diversion route for southbound traffic (Station Approach, Rectory Road and Newton Road) and along the northbound traffic voluntary diversion route (Wellingborough Road and Washbrook Road).

A count-up at the end of these investigations showed that there are one hundred and forty varied signs for the motorist. This does not include the traffic lights near St. Mary’s Church, nor does it include the two zebra crossings in High Street or the zebra crossing in Wellingborough Road.

Seemingly Endless
Driving through Rushden, the motorist sees a seemingly endless stream of signs, denoting directions, car parks, public conveniences, low bridge, halt, slow, school, “road narrows,” “do not spit,” no right turn, no entry, no heavy vehicles, keep left – and, inevitably, NO WAITING.

The no-waiting signs easily outnumber the other types. Their presence in dozens upsets many out-of-town drivers and causes frustration for even more local people who want to leave their cars for only a few minutes in order to make a brief call at a shop. Six of these signs went up in Rectory Road last week, to reinforce the five already standing there.

The Yellow Line
As a Ministry of Transport experiment, a four-inches wide yellow line is to be painted down the one side of Rectory Road where waiting is prohibited, but the signs will remain.

This experiment is said to have been very successful at Slough, where it was first tried out, but for local people it will be just one more thing in the planning which is making Rushden a town of paint and posts.

The Rushden Echo and Argus, 28th November 1958, transcribed by Gill Hollis

One-way streets proposed
An extension of the one-way traffic plan recently put forward by Rushden Urban Council was suggested at a meeting of Higham Ferrers and Rushden Road Safety Committee on Monday. [see also Council meeting Nov 1958]

Sent in by Mr. W. J. A. Peck, who could not attend the meeting, the proposal was to use Church Street, Church Parade and Skinner’s Hill for a trial period as one-way streets, with a right-hand rotation of traffic.

The idea will be passed on the Rushden UDC whosehandling of the main traffic scheme was the subject of a further message from Mr. Peck.

He said he was surprised that the council had not asked the committee for its views. Mrs. W. M. Lean, the road safety chairman, said she attended the Highways Committee meeting at which the scheme was devised, in two capacities – as a highways member and as the Road Safety Committee chairman.

Members were told that the scheme would probably be referred to them for their observations after going through other channels, and Mr. F. C. Astle said he did not think the committee had been slighted.

County Team
News that the safe cycling team from Rushden Secondary Modern Girls’ School had now been recognised as the county team was received with pleasure. Mention was made of the leadership given by Janice Lawman, who attended Monday’s meeting as a representative of the Junior Accident Prevention Committee.

Mr. H. Valvona, who coaches the team as County Road Safety Officer, said the displays given were the best form of propaganda.

An analysis of accidents was received from Mr. Peck, who observed that the incidence of accidents to cyclists and pedal cyclists increased during the summer months. In the same period the proportion of local people involved dropped from 80 per cent to 60 per cent.

The secretary (Mr. A. G. Crowdy) told members that reconstruction of the Oakley crossroads was not allowed for in this year’s County Council estimates, but would be considered in connection with next year’s estimates.



Click here to return to the main index of features
Click here to return to the Transport index
Click here to e-mail us